Blackstone Project Management
2026-10-16T05:08:06.625Z
If you’re considering Blackstone Project Management Ltd (BPM) or Bobby Prajitno for a building project, please read this before signing anything. We wish someone had written a review like this when we were doing our due diligence. Had we known then what we know now, we’d never have engaged BPM.We contracted BPM in March 2024 for a substantial renovation and full reclad of our family home, including a granny flat. Work commenced in May 2024 with a contractual construction period of 150 working days (approximately 7 months).By February 2026 — approximately 21 months later — our home was still incomplete, defects and outstanding work remained, and CCC hadn’t been achieved. BPM then left the site. We formally asked BPM to return and complete the work, but it advised it wouldn’t return unless its proposed close-out arrangements were agreed.The dispute proceeded to formal adjudication under the Construction Contracts Act. We don’t discuss its substance here. The contract has since ended and we’ve had to engage others to finish and rectify work and progress our home towards CCC.This was our home, not simply a construction project. While it remained unfinished, we carried the additional cost of two rental properties. The prolonged uncertainty, delays and disputes were exhausting and enormously stressful.Our biggest learning: get everything in writing — although even this didn’t prevent disputes. We kept extensive emails, messages, payment records and meeting recordings, yet BPM disputed matters we believed were supported by the contemporaneous record.Milestone payments based on “substantial completion” were particularly problematic. We made substantial milestone payments but were left with work associated with earlier milestones still incomplete. Define exactly what must be finished, inspected and documented before each payment is due.Bobby’s extended overseas absences also affected our project. During one such period, while progress had effectively stalled, we repeatedly sought certainty about his return. We weren’t provided with anyone who, in our experience, had equivalent decision-making authority in his absence. Payment demands continued. When we raised his absence, Bobby responded in writing that the contract didn’t require him to remain in Auckland or New Zealand throughout the project.Site supervision became a serious concern. Initially BPM had an LBP regularly on site. That LBP left and wasn’t replaced by another LBP in the same regular on-site capacity. Different builders and subcontractors worked on our project, but we saw no consistent BPM supervision or quality-control process on site.Bobby rarely visited the site. We sometimes had to be very persistent to get an on-site meeting. Promised weekly written progress reports fell away and we repeatedly had to chase BPM for updates.Even after BPM left, we continued chasing CCC documentation. Despite repeated requests, including through our lawyer, months later we were still pursuing Records of Work, producer statements, warranties and as-built information, and had to approach some subcontractors directly.We repeatedly sought commitments and gave opportunities for matters to be resolved. We still ended up with an unfinished home and had to bring in others to complete it.Our advice: do very thorough due diligence and make the contract exceptionally detailed. Define milestones, payment conditions and “substantial completion”. Put every agreement and variation in writing. Identify who’ll supervise the work and what happens if they leave. Require compliance documents progressively. Keep everything.We trusted BPM with our home and expected them to see the project through. Knowing what we know now, we wouldn’t engage Blackstone Project Management again.